Disclaimer

Monday, January 16, 2012

Brothers in arms, Start playing the game."



By Siddhanth

He is a journalist, who puts across his case with a very refreshing degree of ease and logic, though many of us , "Aam Aadmi", may find it difficult to agree to his views, but, he puts his point across very well.

At dinner last night, Gen. V.K. Singh, the chief of the Indian Army, came up in conversation. Regrettably, but also inevitably, it wasn’t because of what he may or may not have accomplished in his four decades in uniform, but because of his date of birth. As is the norm in this great democracy of ours, the Armed Forces only find mention in the national dailies in one of two situations. The first, in times of war, when it is but natural to be swayed by the spirit of nationalism and populist fervour and report the heroics of the men and women who go into battle. The second, and this is the more frequent by far, is when there is some sort of “scam”. Whether it is isolated incidents of Army personnel selling fuel, generals being involved in loosely defined “land scams” or Chiefs trying to get their dates of birth changed, as far as most normal members of civil society are concerned, that is all there is to it.


So going back to this dinner time conversation last night, the general consensus was that Gen. Singh was bringing dishonour to himself and to the Army by going to court over his date of birth, whereby he would keep the job for another year and by extension, get to live in the beautiful Army House in New Delhi till that extended term was over.


My only question then, as it is now, is why the men and women in the Armed Forces should hold themselves to a higher standard than anyone else in this country has ever been asked or required to. And why every Indian considers it his right to hold these men and women to standards that he may not hold himself to. I was told that in India, the Army (when I say army, please read armed forces. I mean no disrespect to the other services, it’s just easier to type) is the only institution in the governmental fold that has maintained a sense of discipline, efficiency and integrity and that civilians look at the army with respect and expect its members to conform to the high standards it has set in the years since 1947, blah, blah, blah. All of this is, of course, true. And the central point of my argument is that by consistently setting itself higher standards than the rest of the nation, the army has done itself the greatest disservice possible.


The “respect” for the army is the first point of contention. This so-called respect exists in the drawing rooms of a very limited set of individuals who have some sort of social or emotional connect with the armed forces. As a nation, there is anything but. That the armed forces have been systematically removed from the nation’s decision making matrix by a largely self-serving bureaucracy and intelligence establishment is neither new, nor remarkable. But having achieved the initial objective of keeping the upper echelons of the services out of this decision making process even in matters of national security, the civil establishment was not done demonstrating its “respect”.

From the third pay commission onwards, the system has systematically screwed the army and skewed the balance heavily in favour of the civil administration. The army has now been reduced to fighting for one rank one pension, a battle that has been summarily ignored by the nation’s free media. As individuals, pensioners have been reduced to beggars, pleading an apathetic government to give them what is rightfully due after decades of service. We can go on and on about longevity of service, virtually guaranteed promotions, corruption… but the point of this little rant is not to criticise the way the civil administration functions, but to actually pat them on the back suggest to the upright men in olive green (or Air Force blue or Navy whites) that the way forward is not to consider themselves above the other organs of government and their political masters. The way forward—the only way forward—is for the armed forces to get into playing the same game.

How many cases have there been of MLAs, MPs, ministers or even members of opposition parties occupying accommodation in prime locations even when they are not entitled to? How many other cases have there been of civil servants holding on to government accommodation in New Delhi while on posting elsewhere? Does it even merit a story in a newspaper? Does it lead to esteemed national newspapers calling for their resignation? Probably not. It just isn’t a big enough deal. We know bureaucrats and politicians are corrupt. So then why bother talking about what they are doing wrong? We can’t expect any better from them. But the army? Now that’s a different ball game. Those guys should know better than to try and hold on to house for a year longer than they are allowed to. It is, after all, the only institution that has any respect in this country. The men and women who form its ranks are brought up in a different India—an India where there is safe drinking water, no poverty, education for all and the integrity of men in unimpeachable. What’s that? They aren’t? They go to the same schools and colleges as us and exist in the same socio-cultural milieu? Really? To use a borrowed phrase, “whodathunkit”?


Forget about MPs and MLAs. Let’s talk about common people. Let’s say a constable in the Delhi Police. How can he (even if he is a head constable), on his  government salary of six kilos of peanuts and two dozen almonds a month, afford to drive around town in a brand new car, complete with four wheels and a CD player? At that rank in the army, you can barely afford a two-wheeled contraption propelled by said army man’s feet at the pedals. But where’s the story there? Cops are corrupt. Everyone knows they are. The guy joined the Army to serve the nation. So if he sold a few litres of military issue diesel in the black market to send his daughter a new dress for her birthday, I say we should lynch the bugger.


The point is that I don’t know what Gen. VK Singh’s motivation for getting his date of birth changed is. I’ve never had the opportunity to meet the man, and if I do I will ask him. Gen. Singh came in for more criticism when he said the government was treating him like the chief of the Pakistani Army. Would that he were so lucky. Had he been doing the same job on the other side of the border, god knows he would have to answer to anything as absurd as a civilian government. 

I am by no means an expert, but I do hold the opinion that in this great democracy of ours, everyone has to fight for what he wants. Just like the bureaucracy has spent the last sixty or so years setting itself up for retirement in luxury, and politicians have been getting fat at the cost of everyone else, it is time for the army too to realise, it owes allegiance only to itself. As long as the armed forces continue to complete the tasks they are mandated to with the unparalleled efficiency that has become their norm, let other matters not be of their concern. As long as the officers have the respect of the men under their command (which is all you have anyway, don’t let anyone fool you into believing otherwise), why should they be bothered about earning the respect of the businessman who doesn't know the difference between a subedar major and a major general? Or the babu who might pay 5 crore for a posting so that he can make 50 crore when he gets the job? Or the pot-bellied, fat-arsed journalist (that’s me) who claims to be free and fair, but in truth is only serving the same political master he goes to bed with? 

I do not know what will happen of Gen. Singh, but I do hope his tryst with destiny and the date of his birth will open eyes and open doors. I do hope that every man and woman in uniform will fight (using democratic means, of course) to hang on to that house that they waited two years to get in the first place, and for every rupee of that pension that you or your brothers in arms shed their blood for. And if you can hold on to it for one day longer, get one rupee more, you will be a hero in my book. And you will have played the game—and won.

"An interesting article. Interesting. But sad, if the game were to be played that way. Sad that ultimately we are now coming around to reading, appreciating  and indeed believing this may be the right path. After all with years of neglect and indifference, how long can one face injustice and keep 'lumping it'?"


Sent by Col RP Chaturvedi,

5 comments:

  1. THE HONORABLE GEN V K SINGH MUST FIGHT TOOTH AND NAIL FOR SOMETHING HE BELIEVES IN AND RIGHT. FOR TOO LONG INDIAN GOVERNMENTS HAVE TREATED THE ARMED AND CENTRAL ARMED POLICE FORCES AS SERVANTS OF COOLIE COLONY, BECAUSE CORRUPT DGs AND GENERALS HAVE BEHAVED LIKE COOLIES. WHEN GENERAL THAPER COULD EASILY SAY "NO" TO A TOTALLY ILL-PREPARED AND NOT EVEN EQUIPPED WITH BASIC UNIFORMS FOR THE ARMY TO FIGHT THE WELL PREPARED CHINKEYS, HE DID NOT ACT LIKE A GENERAL, AND CAUSED HUGE LOSS OF LIFE AND CASUALTIES. GENERAL MALIK DID NOT TAKE A STAND ASKING WEAK VAJPAYEE FOR AIR POWER FROM THE BEGINNING COSTING 527 VALUED LIFE AND OVER 2000 INJURED SOLDIERS. THEN WE HAD GEN VIJ AND GEN KAPOOR AND SOME OTHER GENERALS WHO ACTED MORE LIKE LOOTING BANIYAS THAN GENERALS IN COMPANY WITH POLITICIANS.
    I MOST SINCERELY HOPE, GENERAL V K SINGH WINS HIS CASE IN THE SUPREME COURT AND TEACH A LESSON TO INDIA'S SCAM-STARS AND DESPICABLE POLITICIANS
    AMIT BHADHURI
    FORMER CISF OFFICER

    ReplyDelete
  2. During Gen Vij tenure Army was deployed after Parliament attack and lost 750 men in mine warfare who is to be blamed.When the nation was not ready for war.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Fully support Gen VK Singh. No one and his uncle cares for armed forces.Some examples:
    a) The ministry of defence is the only ministry which does not have anyone from the defence forces.In every other ministry, wether it's railways, tourism, agriculture or so on has people from the same department in it. But defence ministry is manned by civilians.Armed forces are a group of people attached to ministry of defense.

    b) There are a number of civil services created for supporting defence like Indian Defence Account Services,Indian Defence Engineering services, Armament services and even a Armed forces HQ service!!!!!!!!!!!!All of these guys are entitled to defence canteen,liquor, vehicles etc but work from 10-5 every day.

    c)it's sad that the promotion prospects have reduced so much that a brigadier who was equivalent to a IG is now lesser than DIG.

    the only way out is to vote the govt out .........

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's really great to spend holiday vacation with this such kind of accommodation.

    Hostel Tel Aviv

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't know whether Gen V K Singh is right or wrong ...but as per my own experience defence force's senier officers are same as the other departments officers'...fully corruct..

    ReplyDelete