by Lt-Gen Harwant Singh ( Retd )
During the Second World War, Admiral Cunningham, rejecting his staff recommendation
to abandon the British ground forces on Crete, to save
Royal Navy ships from attacks by German submarines, then dominating the
Atlantic, told them that it takes three hundred years to build a tradition but
only three years to build a ship. The Royal Navy has the tradition of never
abandoning the army, so we will evacuate the army regardless of the possibility
of losing many ships. Equally it takes a long time to build great institutions. Indian Army was one
such institution, created over a long period of time: painstakingly and with
enormous sacrifices. That is what Indian Army was at the time of
independence. In 1947, when called upon to save Kashmir from marauding
Tribal hordes, a mere hundred and fifty men from it successfully blocked the
path of elements of Pak army and Tribal hordes from reaching the Srinagar
airfield and thus saved the valley.
Nehru’s pathological
dislike for the army gave the bureaucracy the chance it longed for, to demolish
this great institution. The success in undoing this Army was so complete that
it took the Chinese little effort to put to flight, this world renowned
military with enviable record across two World Wars.
It all started sometimes during the mid fifties and has carried on till this
day. To demoralize an army, all you need to do is to strike down its pride.
Now defence services, even if one overlooked the travails of service,
were given higher pay and pension due to their early retirement and extremely
limited promotions. Just, as one example, the pension of superior scale
officers in the civil (Accountant General, Secretaries to Government of India
etc ) after 25 years service was fixed at Rs 1111/ while that of a Maj-Gen
was Rs 1227/ per month. Military officers drew 70% of their pay as pension,
while those in the civil services got less than 50 percent of last pay drawn,
as pension.
This was reversed, both systematically and in a sustained manner without any
rationale and there being no change in related parameters, which in the first
place had led to earlier fixations of pay and pensions. This new dispensation
brought down the status of army officers. Thus suprintendant of police (SP) who
equated with a captain in the army claimed equivalence with a Lt-Col /
Colonel. Personnel other than officers, who retire at much younger age, were
disadvantaged to much greater extent. The political executive’s silence was
bought, by keeping it in awe of a possible military take over.
This new dispensation, led to a situation where less and less suitable material
opted for service with the military and shortages in the officer cadre kept
mounting. Therefore, a bureaucratic solution had to be found to this
discontentment in the military. Ajay Vikram,
who had enough experience of working with the MoD, headed the committee (known
as AV Committee ) to rework the promotion prospects in the military. He
lacked knowledge of the long established systems of ranks, their place in the
scheme of things, relation of rank to command structures and the nature of job
at hand. So he went about simply increasing vacancies in the higher ranks
without any relation to command structures. Field rank, which was once a
very respectable rank, was reduced to almost zero.
This merely led to further devaluation and degradation of the military ranks
and made functioning at unit level, the cutting edge of any military, somewhat
dysfunctional. It further lowered status attached to military ranks and
consequently pride. Then to meet its aspirations, bureaucracy gave itself and
other All India Group A Services ( more than four dozen in number ) the
largesse of what is called Non-Functional Up-gradation (NFU) This assured
everyone in these services, promotion upto additional secretary level,
regardless of performance parameters and availability of posts. Military
was deliberately excluded from this bonanza on the plea that it has, no such aspirations. This has led to further lowering of status of
military officers and distorted the working in areas where civilian formed
part of military establishments, i.e MES, Border Roads Organisation etc.
Military was, presumably required, not to reason why, but merely to do and die!
When all this was being meted out to the defense services, their top
echelons looked the other way!
It
may not be possible to turn the clock back to the nineteen fifties, but this
enhancement of vacancies, brought in by the AV Committee, in higher ranks in
the military, be done away with and defence services granted NFU from the time
of Sixth Pay Commission.
Equally it is
time to recast the military's officer cadre into regular and short service in the
ratio of 40:60. Short service of fixed period of seven years with assured
lateral induction into state police/Central Police Organisations/civil
services/reserved vacancies in technical colleges with two years full pay as
stipend.
We await,
the moment when this government will undo a grave wrong done to, once a great
institution.
Who is responsible,think.Soldiers are ditched by officers and same treatment you got from IAS.
ReplyDeleteArmy itself is responsible for all the rot. We ourselves denied NFU. Gen Deepak Kapoor mandalised the Army by distributing much more vacancies to the Infantry and Artillery thereby completely changing the hierarchy. So, the Army has itself to blame but obviously, like all other problems in the Country the Army blames the politicians and the bureaucracy.
ReplyDelete