Hon'ble Prime Minister sir,
As I understand, the Short
Service Commission (SSC) in the armed forces was designed and introduced
to have young and battle fit officers continuously available, in place of
Emergency Commission officers from 1964 onwards and simultaneously reduce the
financial burden on the govt. Rightly the commission period of 5
years in army/air force and 7 years for navy was prescribed. The officers
were either made permanent or released with gratuity on completion of this
tenure. On completion of such tenure the officer was under 30 yrs age and
easily got adjusted to next job and civil life. How ever some fertile
brains started working at MoD/Army/Navy/Air Force and quietly extended it to 10
years and then further extended to 14 years period of commission, simply
with intention to cheat the youth of this nation by taking more
service without paying equally for it. To deprive the equal rights of
pension and medical care, for equal service period by saying its
Short Service Commission (SSC). But here also Arbitrarily some
Short Service Commission officers being granted
retiring pension/ medical care /ECHS after completing of 12 years
service and the other SSC officers not even on completion
of 14 years service.
The point of illegality and violation of the statutory
regulations and the Constitution of India starts after completion of 10
years service by an officer, when the govt. do not give equal benefits for
equal service period, despite the minimum service prescribed
for pensionary benefits for central govt.
employees is 10 years, when permitted to retire/retired. I
know the brains in the ministries will give big explanation
by adding a word and sentence here and there to justify what is being done is
legal and right. My humble suggestion is that If the govt. do not
wish to give pension and consequential benefits for more than 10 years service
to the SSC officers, as applicable to all other central govt.
servants when retired/released on completion of 10 years, then just
release the officer in 5-7 years OR grant permanent
commission and avoid the Exploitation, Discrimination and
violation of the Constitution of India, which
guarantees the Equality.
If the govt. retires/releases an officer after ten years
service then same rule must apply to all officers irrespective of the
name/ type of entry or type of commission - PC or SSC. Because
Constitution of India and Army/Navy/Air Force Acts applies equally to all officers and
they work under same conditions/law and get same pay and allowance during the
service. Therefore equal benefits should be given for equal period of service
when released/retired by the govt. and same cannot be denied by stating
that its SSC or PC or on any other pretext.
Since the pension amount is granted for years of service rendered
by the employee, therefore one cannot be Discriminated against,
despite serving equal years of service in the same service, under any
pretext. But shockingly the statutory pension regulations
have been ARBITRARILY applied under the rule of Might is
Right by the Ministry of Defence officials and it has been blindly
followed by services HQs. The officials do not even wish
to read the laid down statutory regulations in letter and spirit, and
always state what is NOT specified in the regulations, and
blatantly disobey the law. The officials create/amend the statutory law by
adding/deleting a word therein, while making a statement. They simply
do not believe in Rule of Law and have become law makers.
Some officials have arrogance and audacity to say- Go to
Court. We will see. They can say so because the ex-employee suffer
the Injury caused by the officials, and nothing happens to the official
for his illegal actions. They even get away by submitting
false and misleading statements in the hon'ble courts
and parliament.
The enemy bullets will not differentiate between
Permanent Commission officers or direct Short Service commissioned
officers or a jawan granted a Short Service commission. An officer
is an Officer and must get equal benefits for equal years of service on
his retirement/release as Admissible to a permanent commission officer.
Therefore when the govt. retires/releases an officer at its
will, its the duty of the govt. to treat all officers equal for equal
service and must apply the regulations as applicable to the
officers. It can not deny the earned benefits/pension
by just saying that one is direct Short Service Commission
officer or one is a jawan granted Short service commission or
the other is a Permanent Commission officer or on
any other pretext or any other reason NOT
specified in the statutory regulations and leave
the officer to fend for himself after extracting
10- 14 years or more service out of his prime life.
The youth is and
can be EXPLOITED by the govt. because large number of
educated BSc/ Btech/Mtech and unemployed youth is available, who is
in hurry to get a job and happy to become directly an officer. But
at time of recruitment the truth is suppressed and he is
not told what all benefits a equivalent Permanent
Commission officer or all central govt. employees get,
if released/retired after 10 years. Once in the defence services,
he/she can not raise voice against the discrimination due to the fear of
Military Law. After the govt. exploit him/her for
10-14 or more years and releases from the clutches of Army Act, he is
again busy searching for job to survive, try maintain the officer's
status and take care of his growing family needs at age
around 35+ and perforce does not think what wrong has been done
to him/her by the Govt.
Hence the
government continues with the wrong policy of
Exploitation/Discrimination.
Look at the plight and Dignity
of an Officer = For more than ten years he/she is Class I officer, live,
eat with dignity with permanent commission officers, but day after
released/permitted to retire from service becomes equal to a
BEGGAR, despite no fault of his/her, as he/family has to
stand in line with the beggars at govt. general hospital to get
treatment. Because the govt. has not provided any/equal benefit of
his more than 10 years service after forcibly
released/retired, e.g. pension and medicare/ ECHS. Which is available to
all other central govt. servants, if retired/permitted to retire/released
by the govt. at any time after rendering 10 years service.
By arbitrarily denying pension(whatever amount may be for 10+ yrs
) and medicare after making the officer work for more than
50%(10yrs +) to 75% (14 yrs+) or more of the officers working life
out of 20 years ( becomes entitled for Full pension), is
nothing but Exploitation, Discrimination, Injustice and
blatant Violation of the Constitution of India.
The Short Service Commission should not be more than 5 years (25%
service of full pension service). Otherwise make him/her permanent to
avoid violation of the Constitution of India. However it is felt that all
civilian authorities are not bothered to read the existing
law and ignores/suppresses same to deprive the officer of
his legal rights to take service without paying for it. They only
read randomly what suits their thinking/ perception/mind set and
ignore the law/regulations which exist and are
applicable. Its simply done under the arrogance
of having the deciding authority.
Would an IAS officer or a hon'ble Judge agree to such service
condition where he will not get pension and other benefits attached
with the word pension, if the govt. retires
him/her after 10 years service ?.
Most people of India do
not know that the law makers have made them selves entitle to life time
pension just after ONE day in Parliament (LS/RS) and have also made the
hon'ble Supreme Court judges entitle to pension after ONE day
service in the court. Except these two class of public servant, no
other public servant gets service/retiring pension before
completing ten years service. I am not sure if such benefit is given to
these two class of public servants any where in the world
after serving ONE day in office, except if unfortunately one die
in office.
However same officials / Judges do
not even allow to read the existed pension regulations and do not
wish to give pensionary benefits to Defence officers, even
after making him/her serve for 10 -14 years or more, by
quoting this or that excuses/reasons/pretext, despite the
Constitution/ laws/regulations providing for it. The
existing regulations have been applicable equally to
all officers, but same have been applied ARBITRARILY to
deprive the defence officer of his legal and constitutional rights.
A mere statement of a govt. advocate is taken as law
and the defence officers being deprived of their legal
rights. Thereafter, No body wants to listen/discuss about the
Injustice been done to the defence officers. If a mere statement of a
govt. advocate is law then we do not need lawmakers.
The govt. should either release
the Short Service Commission officer on completion of 5 years service or grant
permanent commission. Thereafter as and when the govt. retires/permits to
retire, the officer, he/she must get all rights as provided by the
law/regulations and as granted to a govt. employee/ defence officer after 10
years qualifying service, if retired/released by the govt.
Sincerely yours,
Received from G.S. Beniwal
The views
expressed by the author are his own and left to public to judge and rationalise
for themselves.
My sympathies are with you and many like you. thank god you have your life and limbs intact. atleast you will get a job and should be able to discharge your
ReplyDeleteduty to uour parents family and perhaps with hard work will be able to fulfillyour desires in life.
mod and armed forces HQ seniors are perhaps more eviland dangerous to fight than the pakistan armed forces whom you were trained to fight
Now with Govt agreeing upon OROP and showing positive sign to Defense people, why can't we project all this through a common form and take it up with authorities. It seems that we are all together a different class after release from service. No Pension, No medicare, No membership, its high time to change all this. Lets launch it through a platform and see if it can move.
ReplyDeletek.neeraj32@gmail.com
One of the best written article about the plight of Short Service Commission. I agree with you that the tenure should be limited to 05 years and ECHS benefits should be given to those who serve for ten years.
ReplyDeleteSir, you explained it in the best possible way to our dear PM,atleast ECHS facilities should be given to all SSC officers,after all we have given our prime age of settlement to the country.
ReplyDeleteYou are aware that as per the existing rules, SSCOs/ECOs are treated as ESM.
DeleteIt entitles them for CSD, MH and other facilities.
However, these officers can not become members of ECHS since for enrolling in
ECHS, one has to be ESM drawing pension. SSOs/ECOs do not draw pension.
However, the present Raksha Mantri, vide Govt. of India Press Release No.
54790 dt 30.11.2009 (copy attached), had stated that govt has agreed to ECHS
for SSCOs. But this scheme has still not been confirmed and implemented by MOD.
In this Press Release, RM had stated that number of SSCOs admitted during 2006-09
were between 315 - 575. Based on it, we can,for statistical purposes, safely assume
that an average of 500 officers are admitted in OTA each year and again assume 50%
are released.
We further assume that 45 years is the average residual life span of these released
officers. Therefore total number of ex SSCOs who are alive at any given time will be
around 11250.
Again assuming 15% of these 11250 officers falling sick at any time, then choosing
and availing ECHS facility,this figure will be only around 1700 (staggered all over India).
For ECOs, for which recruitment/release was stopped around 1970, the number of surviving
ECOs as of now will be very low.
We also know that there are around 25 lakhs ex-servicemen who are availing ECHS facilities.
As such, it will not be a big strain on the MOD/AMC, if in addition to these 25 lakhs ECHS
beneficiaries, SSCO/ECOs are also included in the ambit of ECHS
Again, RM had also stated in this Press Release that to encourage youth to join the Armed
Forces, various steps have been taken which includes provision of medical facilities to all
SSCOs after release under ECHS.
On this issue, IESM’s Vice Chairman had also written letter dated 7.8.2012 to RM with
copies to three Service Chiefs (copy given below).
The complete SSCOs, ECOs fraternity will be grateful to you If you kindly take up this matter
with the concerned authorities for making them members of ECHS.
Best Regards,
Capt Kuldeep Khera
Sir, Short Service Commissioned Officers should have reservation in Public Sector jobs even for Group 'A'. Then Officers need not worry about the second career if they have some hope that they can join Engineering Services / Administrative Services or any other PSU like ECIL, BHEL, DRDO, BARC etc with the pay equal to last drawn pay.
DeleteWhatever has been explained is very right,it's serious exploitation of skilled person,and after investing so much of money on officers for 14 yrs,not absorbing him/her in main stream as permanent job is wastage of precious money and also render the indian citizen who is serving in armed forces paralytic,which is inhuman otherwise.
ReplyDeleteThose who wants to know more on the subject and wish to join in a united fight for pension, medicare and parallel induction/reservation may contact me directly. please remember the politicians do not take any individual seriously and only give letters which are issued more for creating confusion then solution. please also remember the service HQs are also not your friend. i will provide all free legal assistance and any of you can lead the war. ( a senior citizen- retd officer) Email: beniwalg@ymail.com
ReplyDeleteBiggest problem is that nobody in armed forces have time or energy to fight for ssc officers,bcoz all people who are in positions of decision making ,or officers in service headquarters are permanent commisioned officers.They will glorify all their sacrifices and will demand compensation in return but no policy maker or senior in armed forces has seriously fought for ssc officers.they are treated as second grade officers during service and kicked out on retirement.
ReplyDeleteMy Dear Friends,
ReplyDeleteAs an org ARMY is not bad at all.Those of you who served a little longer in civil life will agree with me.I worked for 9 years in Govt org after release,thus living the secured life with pension benefits and the like.Then one day I left everything and joined Private Sector.I made up for everything lost in just 5 years and the race is still on.It is my strong opinion that SSCOs should not join any service in Govt.They are young at release and can do very well in pvt sector.Army does a lot to prepare the Officers for civil life.I feel emphasis should be given in developing strong skillset like regular MBAs from good institutes at the end of contract and that too at govt expense e.g.study leave with guaranteed seats in colleges/institutes.Very many org in Govt grant study leave after 5 yrs of service.Only in the case of SSCOs there can be reverse liability i.e.contractual service be taken as the bond time before study leave....danivrkum@rediffmail.com
It's no longer 5 years. But 10 years, and if you've been needed to do some specialist course for the Army, then the term of compulsory service is 14 years.
Deleteall of you have said individual views and all are right. unless all of SSC officers comes together nothing(pension/medicare/ECHS) can be got which is yours by law. unfortunately none of you have contacted me. it shows all of you only talk, but do not wish to get the dues. we are talking about dues for past services and not what we get in civil life after defence service. jago faujis. rgds: beniwalg@ymail.com
ReplyDeleteI am ready to fight. I came across this artical only today. Just let me know Sir, what am I supposed to do. My email id is j.internist@gmail.com
DeleteWith warm regards,
Maj jyoti
you are correct sir, but I hope some strong strategy should be made to aware all the SSCOs about this case.
ReplyDeletesir could you please tell me about the opportunities of a doctor in AMC after completion of 7yrs SSC... do we get ex sevice men quota in govt. jobs n PG entrance exams???
ReplyDeleteHas the PM replied or taken note of this ????m with u.... just remember once
ReplyDeleteYES. being further discussed.
DeleteFYI- I am Not SSC officer. i am fighting for the faujis being an ex- fauji.
main problem SSC officers are not united being spread out all over after release.
DeleteSSCOs are getting medical treatment since Sept 2010.
beniwalg@ymail.com
all comments are just readable GOOD
ReplyDeletebut did any SSCO have ever gave a thoght to approach judiciary ?
even some good malyali SSCO of army navy made a joint forum in AFT kochi
& succeded ,verdict was awarded in favour for Med facility for non echs SSCO but MOD ias babu in 03 page reply refused to impliment 12 page judgement of AFT kochi
so judiciary is not being honoured by IAS babus of MOD
now what ?
Pl help me with the judgement of AFT. and MOD reply
ReplyDeleteFuture of officers giving threre prime years in service of nation must be secured , gov must stop this use and throw policy , this issue needs immediate attention and discussion at larger platform , jai Hind.
ReplyDeleteExcellent article!!!....However the irony is that in the recent Advertisement of the Indian Navy they have made compulsory 12 YES TWELVE!!! YEARS OF THE SERVICE. At the end of this Squeeze, Crush and Throw away service poor men/women will be on their own. I ask if govt. is going to increase the maximum age limit in civil services, banks and other group A services as well...the answer is NO...poor officer will be AGE 32-33 yrs after his squeeze, crush and throw away use...he/she will not will be eligible for most of the jobs mentioned above as the upper limit of age in such jobs are 30-32. Not to mention they have to start from scratch...OH!!!!!POOR!!!!SSC!!!!OFFICERS!!!!
ReplyDeleteYes,Sir you are Correct.But Govt. should also give all the services to every officer.
ReplyDeleteMy dream was to join the armed forces.But since I crossed 24 I was not able to apply for IMA, INA or AFA through CDS.And was only left with OTA. Made my mind to prepare for it, but hearing how ssc officers are treated, I have second taughts of joining It. Can't put my future on risk
ReplyDelete