By Col Virender Pal Singh
Anatole
France once asked a soldier, "Do you think you die for your
country?" When the soldier replied in the affirmative, he said,
"Wrong! You die for the INDUSTRIALISTS." I would, in the Indian context, like
to modify his suggestion to read as: WRONG, YOU DIE FOR THE CORRUPT, UNGRATEFUL
and UNCONCERNED. Bureaucrats and politicians head this list, followed by
bulk of unscrupulous businessmen who would qualify to be included in the list.
Soldiers,
today, must learn that they NO MORE fight a Nation's wars but the conflicts
started by inept, inefficient and incompetent BUREAUCRACY of India, in league
with self-centered, greedy and corrupt politicians.
You
ask me to explain it. My answer is very simple. All internal and external
problems of India are created by lack of vision and thought bankruptcy on
strategic matters by two sets of people who rule India, namely, BUREAUCRATS and
POLITICIANS:
* From
Nagaland in the fifties to Mizoram in the sixties;
*
From Assam in the seventies to Punjab and J&K in the eighties;
* From Mumbai riots in the early nineties
to Mumbai attack in 2008;
* From
communal riots in Gujarat to the same in Andhra & Karnataka;
* From killing fields of Bihar and UP to
mafia murders in Mumbai;
* From 'MANDAL' issue to 'KAMANDA'L
issue;
* From demolition of BABRI MASJID to
burning of TRAIN in GODHARA;
* From Naxalite hooliganism to
Communalist mayhem since independence; all this and much more owe themselves to
the misdeeds of an unholy nexus between the bureaucrats and politicians, who
govern this country.
Whether
it was the Indo-Pak wars in1947, 1965 and 1971 or 'WAR LIKE SITUATION 'in
Kargil in 1999 or even Operation PAWAN in Sri Lanka in the late eighties and
the Chinese invasion of 1962-----my dear departed comrades: you did not die for
the nation; instead, you gave your lives so as to cover the callous mistakes of
these people. You are dead and gone. But no one remembers you other than some
politician’s rantings on these annual rituals, called 'Vijay Divas' or the
'VICTORY DAY".
* If
there is a natural calamity in the country---army is called in.
* If law and order goes awry, soldiers
are roped in.
*
If a child is stuck in a bore-well,
soldiers are mustered to save the innocent life.
* BUT, no one punishes the guys
responsible for such acts of omission and commission. In the bargain, if a soldier loses
a life, they play-act a drama, as if they care too much but none does.
There
are many widows of soldiers, who are fighting their lonely battles----- ----no
one is coming forward to help them except some ESM organisations such as IESL
and IESM---to whom no one listens ---not even the Army.
Once
the NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR, while in Germany, had made a remark on the
army's recent projection of anomalies in the Sixth Pay Commission. He retorted
to the questioner, "Don't
worry we will sort out the bast**ds" or words to that effect. He did not
know that MILITARY ATTACHE was also listening and who, then, faxed it to his
chief. You know what happened then. The three chiefs walked up to the PM
with resignation letters in hand.
The
recent case of OROP (One rank One Pension) is an interesting testimony to how
bureaucracy fools everyone. Don't you know the way the soldiers have been
fooled by this announcement in the parliament by our respectable Finance
Minister on July 6 2009, when he vociferously announced implementation of
ONE RANK ONE PENSION for the armed forces. Undoubtedly, it was an attempt to
divide soldiers by announcing it ONLY for PBOR (PERSONS BELOW OFFICERS RANK).
The Govt has, thus, tried to create a wedge amongst officers and PBOR. Even
the so called grant of OROP to PBOR is a fallacy. Unfortunately, the UPA
government is trying to exploit this by allowing some ex- Major in Delhi
distributing leaflets on this. It is utter nonsense. What the Govt has done is
to bring at par the pre-96 retirees with pre- 2006 retirees, which is only a
miniscule segment of pensioners. The bulk of the pensioners lay in the
post-1996 and pre-2006 category, which has been left untouched by the Govt.
This is how our bureaucracy fools everyone and this is how the politicians
willingly play into the hands of bureaucrats. I bet if Pranab Mukerji knows as
to what harm he has done to the Armed Forces by approving this Machiavellian
strategy of bureaucrats. To them, it is NOT the NATIONAL INTERESTS that matter
but their PERSONAL INTERESTS.
They
had done the same thing during implementation and formulation of proposals for
armed forces by SIXTH PAY COMMISSION. It is only due to near-rebellious
situation in the Armed Forces that the Govt reluctantly accepted it. Now the
same bureaucrats have played another dirty trick with the Army and the ESM.
They do not realise that by tampering with the ARMED FORCES and its disciplined
ethics, they are
endangering the security and integrity of the nation.
Just
imagine what happens, if the Armed Forces wither away like police or any other
government organization! Bureaucrats and politicians have broken the back of
police and made them ineffective. Thus Law and Order has become a serious
problem. Like Committed bureaucracy and committed police officials--- -they
want soldiers also to be committed to political parties. If it happens, your
national security be damned. THERE IS A VITAL NEED TO KEEP THE ARMED FORCES
APOLITICAL. But some wise Congressmen think KARGIL-99 was not their war but
BJP’s---similarly BJP will think that 1971 or 1965 wars were not theirs, but of
the Congress’. What happens to soldiers? They too are being cultivated to
divide the Army. Would Congress' soldiers like to die for BJP's war? The
question is ridiculous but this is what Mr Rashid Alvi----- a Congress MP
meant, when he ridiculed the celebrations of VIJAY DIVAS. No congressman asked
him to shut up. How
disgusting.
Often,
I hear the logic, that one joins armed forces voluntarily and that no one
forced them to join. Very right. This very logic has affected the military
ethos. You do not get the quality material anymore because of this lopsided
thinking. Therefore there are aberrations ---corruption cases---rapes-
--misbehaviour- --hooliganism- ---extortion and what not by some officers and
soldiers. It is still under control---but if you continue to ignore them,
certainly he would ask the question: WHY
SHOULD I DIE FOR THESE PEOPLE? IS IT WORTH LAYING DOWN ONE's LIFE FOR SUCH SELF
CENTERED PEOPLE?
Most
of our soldiers come from rural poor backgrounds and they still think of their
poor families before they do any act which might affect their family’s honour.
Therefore, they not only tolerate all sorts of nonsense but also accept the
professional hardships. Their tolerance limits are much more than the soldiers
of other armies.
They
suffer the vagaries of weather and man-made conditions silently. In 1962, they
fought the Chinese with point 303 rifles with just 50 rounds---they went to
snow covered high altitude mountains in their summer clothing. They died. They
were injured but they did not rebel. It was exploitation of their impoverished
background by the nation. Giving medals and awards to a few does not ameliorate
the pain of many others whose deaths go unnoticed and uncared.
The
question is how long the Nation and the Army can keep its soldiers in the
'DENIAL MODE' from their LEGITIMATE DUES and RIGHTS?
Today's soldiers are more aware of their rights and privileges. Education and
literacy is making them INDIVIDUALISTIC. Time is NOT far when they would
behave like the EDUCATED SOLDIERS---- Yes, its implications must be understood
by all and sundry---even the Army. They will question everyone--from their own
bosses to Governmental orders. THEY
WILL NO MORE BE SOLDIERS OF THE 'LIGHT BRIGADE'---WHO WILL AUTOMATICALLY MARCH
INTO THE 'VALLEY OF DEATH' WHILE THE BULLETS FLY LEFT AND RIGHT OF THEM. They will no more sing
the hymn: THEIRS IS NOT TO REASON WHY; THEIRS IS BUT TO DO AND DIE. Therefore, please do understand
that ignoring SOLDIER's MARTYRDOM and his SACRIFICES is going to be very costly
for this Nation. Nation
has to pay the PREMIUM for the SOLDIER's SACRIFICES and MARTYRDOM. Nation has
to pay this premium for its own security and safety. It is NO FAVOUR the Nation
is doing to its soldiers---whether they joined voluntarily or due to some
economic pressures.
The
words of General Douglas Mac Arthur, US army Chief in 1931 echo in my ears,
when he told president Franklin Roosevelt, "Mr
President, when in the next war, an American soldier lay on the ground with
enemy bayonet slicing his abdomen and spat out his last curse, I do not want
the name to be Mac Arthur but ROOSEVELT". It
is no point emphasizing that President Roosevelt gave to the Army what he
wanted. And Second World War is a testimony that US army tilted the balance in
favour of Allied Powers.
Therefore,
I reiterate that dues of Indian soldiers must be given. The Nation must do it.
If you do not do this, then the ULTIMATE WILL HAPPEN-----as a URDU SHAYAR had
said, " AGAR AB BHI NA SAMJHOGE AYE HINDOSTAN WALO---TUMHAARI DAASTAAN TAK
BHI NA HOGI DAASTAANO MEIN"( If you do not mend your ways O' Indians, you
shall evaporate and not exist even in History books). Take it from me,
there will be no more SAFE INDUSTRIES-- -THERE WILL BE NO MORE JET FLYING
'CEOs' and smooth talking corporate managers or the GLOBE TROTTING IT's WONDER
BOYS IN INDIA------- ---THERE WILL BE NO MORE SAFE HOMES FOR YOU TO
INDULGE IN BLOGGING ON SULEKHA----- --IN FACT, THERE WILL BE NO MORE INDIA AS
IT EXISTS TODAY. Decide what
you want.
The last bastion of India's UNITY and INTEGRITY is waiting to
DISINTEGRATE because of CONSTANT TAMPERING WITH it by BUREAUCRACY and
POLITICIANS.
Indian
army has been fighting for 60 years in Nagaland and other North East
States---it has been holding Assam, Kashmir and Punjab for you for the last 25
to 30 years. Despite all this, there are no major cribs against it, other than
media hyped non-sense by vested interests by which some of you get influenced.
Remember, Soldiers are not saints---there will be aberrations but the track
record of Indian armed forces is much better than most of the armies.
I am
appalled to see some debates on Sulekha which talk about wrong doings in the
army. Most of it is based upon misinformation- -but even if there was any
misdeed army is prompt to act and punish the guilty---you know about TEHELKA
expose and what Army did later. Who
else did it and who else does it?
Haven't
you heard the recent murder of a youth in Baramula? There was KASHMIR BANDH on
this on the plea that he was killed by the Army. Now it has turned out that he
was killed by his friends for money. Such
manipulations against Army are quite common in insurgency infected areas.
All
cases of alleged rapes are speedily dealt with---most of them turn out to be
motivated allegations. When you ask soldiers to search for militants at the
dead of a night in a village----such rubbish will be attributed to them. Even
if some soldiers misbehave--- take it, they are NO HOLY MEN. If you want to
avoid such incidents--- ASK THE GOVERNMENT TO SEND THE ARMY BACK TO BARRACKS.
This is what the SEPARATISTS and the MILITANTS want---If some of you, educated
elites of SULEKHA are going to play into the hands of the SEPARATISTS of
KASHMIR like this and believe in their motivated propaganda-- -----then, also be prepared for them to walk
into your homes one day and there would be none to check them.
Look
at the record of Pakistan army in Bangladesh in 1971. More than 10 million
people had become refugees; many lakhs perished and thousands of women were
raped and hundreds of children maimed. Just have a glance at Sri Lanks'a
recently concluded operations against LTTE. What has NOT come out about is,
thousands of CIVILIANS of TAMIL ORIGIN who were killed. Look at what the
PAKISTAN ARMY has done in SWAT? Some 3 million people have been rendered
homeless. There is no independent check of Pakistan Army's claims of killing
some 1000 Taliban (there were only 4000)---No top leader has been killed or
arrested.
Compare the track record of Indian Army against this back drop.
Now,
read "CRISIS IN COMMAND" by RICHARD GABRIEL and PAUL SAVAGE to know
the track record of US army in VIETNAM in the 60s & 70s of the last
century. If still not convinced, then it would be interesting for you to know
of US Army's recent misdeeds in IRAQ in the years 2007 &2008. Here is the
link:-
http://news. yahoo.com/ s/ap/20090727/ ap_on_re_ us/us_soldier_slayings
Here
are some excerpts from this link:-
* “Several soldiers said unit discipline deteriorated while in
Iraq.------- -------"Toward the end, we were so mad and tired and
frustrated," said Daniel Freeman. "You came too close, we lit you up.
You didn't stop, we ran your car over with the Bradley," an armored
fighting vehicle.---- --------- With each roadside bombing, soldiers would fire
in all directions "and just light the whole area up," said Anthony
Marquez, a friend of Freeman in the 1st Battalion, 9th Infantry Regiment.
"If anyone was around, that was their fault. We smoked 'em.---------
---------" "------------ ---------
* Taxi
drivers got shot for no reason, and others were dropped off bridges after
interrogations, said Marcus Mifflin, who was eventually discharged with post
traumatic stress syndrome.
* "You
didn't get blamed unless someone could be absolutely sure you did something
wrong," he said "------------ --------Soldiers interviewed by The
Gazette cited lengthy deployments, being sent back into battle after surviving
war injuries that would have been fatal in previous conflicts, and engaging in
some of the bloodiest combat in Iraq. The soldiers describing those experiences
were part of the 3,500-soldier unit now called the 4th Infantry Division's 4th
Brigade Combat Team.------- --------- -Since 2005, some brigade soldiers also
have been involved in brawls, beatings, rapes, DUIs, drug deals, domestic
violence, shootings, stabbings, kidnapping and suicides. ------------ -------
* The
unit was deployed for a year to Iraq's Sunni Triangle in September 2004.
Sixty-four unit soldiers were killed and more than 400 wounded — about double
the average for Army brigades in Iraq, according to Fort Carson. In 2007, the
unit served a bloody 15-month mission in Baghdad. It's currently deployed to
the Khyber Pass region in Afghanistan- --------- --------- ---------"
* Now
talk about the Indian Army and its track record. It is sixty year for this Army
to hold your nation together from Nagaland to Kashmir and J&K to Kanya
Kumari. It has been involved in wars---low intensity conflicts--- militancy
/terrorism-- -----flood reliefs---children rescue----earthquake relief----you
name a damn thing where you have not called your army---how many INDIANS have
been rendered homeless. It has fought four and a half wars (Kargil was somewhat
a war) for you.
* Some
thousands of soldiers have laid down their lives in these wars and operations
--------they have left their widowed wives; orphaned children; helpless
mothers, sobbing sisters and wailing fathers in your care for, they had faith
in you. Would they have sacrificed their lives if they had an iota of doubt on
your sincerity? They fulfilled their part of the CONTRACT by laying down their
lives for your safety, honour and security. Why are you retracting from your
part of the contract? Please ensure they are not to be ridiculed and
slighted as you are doing it today. I insist soldiers are no saints---they are
from the same society----as you all are----while you have gone astray-----I
mean the society----how do you expect them to remain holy men?
If
soldiers are running berserk at times---it is the social system which is to be
blamed which has begun to TREAT THEM AS DOORMATS. Reform the society
first. Stop this unwanted criticism--- else you break this institution. As a
back lash by the soldiers who will ask: WHY
SHOULD I DIE FOR THESE PEOPLE?
The chor babus and politicans could not care less for the forces. As long as majority of the forces take everything lying down, whilst a few of them are gratified with promotions and perks, all will suffer. Please remove the self imposed constraints. A day may not be far when officers and troops also form unions and hold the govt to ransom, like all other central services do, if it does not listen to their genuine grievances. Even the Court and AFT orders are not being honoured, what more injustices are being waited for, to be heaped upon the defence forces. Hasn’t now time come, to snatch and get the dues? If the forces don’t change with time, then they are bound to get trampled by all and sundry. It may be ideal if an armed forces committee is assembled to assess the wealth of all IAS, IPS and other civilian government officers wealth. When they join they all study in a shared room in Mukerjee Nagar in Delhi for Rs 5000 and within 20 yrs all are worth over Rs 10 crores and by the time they retire they are able to amass some Rs 200 crores or so. ‘Mera Bharat Mahan’. Suitably edited. Ashok
ReplyDeleteEx soldiers NOT likely to get "One rank one pension"
ReplyDeleteThe Prime Minister-appointed pay panel is unlikely to accept the ex-servicemen's demand of One Rank One Pension (OROP). Sources say that the government could agree to modified parity. The committee which is still to submit its report to the Prime Minister has already met the three service chiefs.
One Rank One Pension means two military persons who retired after equal service in the same rank, get equal pension, irrespective of time span separating their retirement date.
Sources, however, say that the government-appointed pay panel is unlikely to agree to this demand. Instead, it may offer modified parity which simply means that for purposes of pension, pay grades will be fixed.
Enhancement of widows' pension, fixing of common scales for all Junior Commissioned Officers (JCOs) and and other ranks (ORs) and the grant of non-functional upgradation may also get the green signal.
The pay panel has met the three service chiefs for their inputs, after repeated warnings that the issue of pay and pension was leading to a whole lot of restlessness among the forces.
Many say, naturally so. For instance: A sepoy who retired in 1995 will get a pension which is roughly 80 per cent less than his counterpart who retired on or after after January 1, 2006.
Worse, three Havaldars with exactly the same length of service could earn different pensions if one retired before 96, the second before 2006 and the third post-2006.
The financial aspect apart, the pay panel has also been told that this one issue was leading to organisational problems, especially in areas where the Army men were working in close co-ordination with his civilian counterparts.
The pay panel's deliberations are still work in progress and the hope is that by Independence Day, the government will have a gift for its men in uniform.