Pay Commission Arrears, a self-inflicted distortion,
says
Finance Commission
The
windfall government employees receive by way of pay commission award
arrears may no longer be forthcoming. The government is examining a proposal to
implement pay commission awards prospectively on the lines of finance
commission awards, as large arrears throw the finances of both the Centre and
states in disarray.
It
is reported that the Government is considering the suggestions of 13th Finance
Commission to avoid payment of arrears arising out of retrospective
implementation of Pay Commission in the future . It is also reported that final call on the issue would be taken
when the next pay commission is constituted. Pay commissions are usually set up
at intervals of 10 years. The
Sixth Pay Commission, the most recent, gave its recommendations in March 2008.
It had proposed pay raises between 20% and 40% for government employees.
The
finance ministry had told a parliamentary panel last week that the issue should
be deliberated upon as retrospective implementation of pay commission awards
has had adverse impact on the finances of the Centre as well as the states, a
government official privy to the meeting said. Many state governments had
expressed concerns over the issue of arrears. States set up pay commissions for
their own employees after the pay commission for the central government
employees submits its report.
"While
many reforms can and should be contemplated to end this self-inflicted
distortion, one action that could be taken immediately is that of making the
pay award commence from the date on which the recommendations of future
pay commissions are accepted by the government," the 13th Finance
Commission had said in its report.
The
burden of arrears on the central government from the Sixth Pay Commission award
was Rs 28,160 crore on a salary base of Rs 44,360 crore. This was because the
recommendations of the panel announced in 2008 were implemented
retrospectively from January 1, 2006.
To save
itself from a larger fiscal trouble, the Centre disbursed the arrears in two
installments: 40% in 2008-09 and 60% in 2009-10. The arrears contributed
significantly to the Centre overshooting its target in 2008-09, ending the year
with a fiscal deficit of 6% of the gross domestic product (GDP) against the
budgeted 2.5%. The fiscal deficit rose to 6.4% of GDP in 2009-10 as pay
commission arrears pushed up the expenditure when the government was battling
slowdown in revenues.
The
Centre had to readjust its fissense but can work only if pay commission reports
come well in time for implementation prospectively," said D K Srivastava,
director, Madras School of
Economics. Unlike the private sector, the government does not give annual
salary hikes to its employees. Instead, it gives out dearness allowance twice a
year to compensate for the rise in prices. The periodic pay commissions help
adjust government salaries to market benchmarks. Most experts
find the system flawed, as performance benchmarks
are not included in the salary revisions. The Sixth Pay Commission had
recommended a performance related pay for government employees.
It has
budgeted a fiscal deficit of 4.6% of GDP for 2011-12, which is projected to
drop to 3.5% in 2013-14. The finance commission had said if the Centre implemented
pay awards prospectively, it would give state governments an opportunity to
time their awards in a way that the need for arrears does not arise.
"If finance
commissions are able to present their inter-governmental recommendations
without any need for retrospective fiscal transactions, then the same should be
possible in the case of pay commission as well," the commission had
reasoned in its report.
**********
Ajay Maken backs cry for seventh pay panel writes to
PM for early set-up
In a
letter addressed to Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh, Maken
underlined how every pay panel since the Second Pay Commission, barring the
Sixth Pay Commission, were set up in the third year of the decade. "We are
again in the third year of the ongoing decade and Central government employees
are justifiably looking forward to the Seventh Pay Commission," he
said.
Recalling
that it was under Singh that the last pay panel was set up in 2005, after the NDA government failed
to do so in 2003, Maken, in the communication dated March 14, requested that a
decision be "taken on priority" for constitution of the Seventh
Central Pay Commission. "A notification for constitution of the 7th
Central Pay Commission is the need of the bour, which is bound to have bearing upon
about 20 million employees," he said.
Maken
concluded by emphasizing that setting up of the new pay panel was in
"larger interest of government employees as well as the (Congress)
party".
**********
Times of India News
Maken
Backs Demand For 7th Pay Panel
In a
move aimed at putting the demand for the 7th Pay Commission on the government's
drawing board, Union minister Ajay Maken has asked Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh to set it up this year to neutralise the effect of soaring
inflation.
His
demand this week is the first voice in support of the panel from within Singh's cabinet.
"Erosion
of real wages owing to the degree of inflation... is hurting employees,"
he wrote in a letter accessed by HT.
Retail prices rose 160% during 2006-2011 but
dearness allowance went up only 51%.
Besides,
Maken argued, it was time to rework the principles on which public sector wages
were fixed in order to attract and retain talent.
He said
it was no longer enough to pay employees to simply meet minimum needs.
The
finance ministry, struggling to bring fiscal deficit under control, has
rejected demands from government employees to set up the panel - generally appointed in the
third year of every decade.
It is right time to frame 7th pay panel to recommend pay hike. Why there is late in bringing out next pay panel. The mounted pay will only be in force w.e.f. 01-01-2016.
ReplyDeleteThe date of effect is dictated by the 13th Finance Commision report. While the govt is to be blamed for delaying in announcing the Pay Panel, the date of effect should be at least Jan.2013, if not, Jan.2011.Otherwise justice is denied and Pay Panel will lose its validity.
ReplyDelete