Sh AK Antony Dated: 18 May 2013
Raksha Mantri
WHY VETERANS
ISSUES IGNORED WITH IMPUNITY?
Dear
Sh. A.K. Antony,
1. We have
been writing to you for your
intervention to address anomalies, discrepancies and deficiencies in Pay &
Pensions, One Rank One Pension (OROP), Health Care, Registration as Voters at
the place of posting in respect of serving
defence personnel, canteen facilities to the veterans, restructuring of
DESW, freeing the AFTs from the MoD
Control etc. While a miniscule of our demands have been accepted but sadly most
of our major issues/demands still require to be attended to by your
Ministry. The fact, your good self has
not even acknowledged our letters,
leave alone taking action, is what makes us feel hurt, anguished and
angry. Our request to meet our
delegation has also not been granted by you as yet.
2. Mr.
Defence Minster, we are your erstwhile soldiers and expect you to meet our
genuine concerns and spare us from harassment and injustice. May we ask you the following:-
(a) Why has the recommendations of Rajya Sabha
Petition Committee on OROP, presented in the Rajya Sabha on 19 Dec 2011
strongly recommending the grant of OROP holistically to all defence personnel, not been accepted
so far ? Your reply in the Parliament
and outside that “We are bridging the gap” does not inspire any confidence
since OROP means REMOVAL OF THE GAP and not bridging. Even the legal view is in favour of grant of
OROP. Defence fraternity alongwith their
family members and supporters have. “Voting Power” of over Ten Crores. Your continuous neglect of and injustices to
the Defnece Forces, both serving and retired have already antagonised this
large population of the country.
(b) Why recent
enhancement of pensions to correct a serious intentionally introduced anomaly
in 6th CPC award and corrected by the courts, has been made
effective from 24 Sep 2012 instead of 01 Jan 2006? The recent judgement dated 29th
April 2013 of Delhi High Court where Govt petition has been dismissed and the 6th
CPC arrears are to be paid from 01 Jan 2006 needs to be implemented for the
Defence personnel also at the earliest.
(c) Why the AFTs have not been made free from the
Administrative Control of MoD and placed under the Law Ministry? Why the civil contempt powers have not been granted
to the AFTs so far? The AFTs which were
created to provide speedy and economical justice to the Defence personnel,
infact have become big hurdle in dispensing the justice to them.
Every case is being contested against the judgement of AFTs by MoD in
the SC.
(d) Strange is the system where the Govt is
fighting against its own soldiers. The
case of the Solicitor General not appearing for scheduled hearings in SC on 17
occasions in the Rank Pay Case is known to you.
Inspite of a clear judgement, MoD has not implemented it in letter and
spirit, denying thousands of defence personnel both serving and retired and
family pensioners their legitimate dues. Just to amplify the injustice, I quote
my example, I was Lt Col on 01-01-86 and became Col on 05-02-87, Brig in May
1993 and Maj Gen in Aug 2000. The total
arrears and the interest paid to me by CDA is Rs 2742/- How ridiculous it is to
get this amount? Mr. Defence Minister I was denied Rs 800/- per month, Rs 1000
per month and Rs 1200 per month with effect from the dates of my promotion
mentioned above. As per the SC judgement, the pay scales for the 4th CPC were
to be reworked out and carried forward to 5th and 6th
CPC. Multiplication by 2 and 2.4 were to be applied to the newly worked out
scales of 4th CPC for the 5th and 6th CPCs
respectively. The judgement
was to be applicable to all serving and retired defence personnel and
family pensioners but the MoD has again manipulated the wording in the implementation letter by changing the wording of the judgement “With effect from 01-01-86” to “
As on 01-01-86”., thus denying the
legitimate dues to thousands of defence personnel and family pensioners. Why such a lackadaisical and apathetic attitude of MoD towards its soldiers?
(e) You are aware that widows pensions specially
of jawans widows which count for approx 85 percent, has not been
increased. The minimum family pension
has not been increased for the past over ten years. With only Rs 3500 per month how do you expect
the widow to manage her needs? Why
family pension is reduced to 60% of the ESM pension is again not
understood? If the wife die’s earlier,
the ESM continues to get full pension but when the ESM passes away first, the
spouse is left with 60% of pension.
There should be no reduction and NOK should continue to get full pension
of the ESM. During our meeting with you
in your office, you had assured us about enhancement of widows’ pensions. The same has not been enhanced so far.
(f) It defies
all logic as to why Non Functional Upgrade (NFU) and 3rd Career
Progression have not been granted to defence personnel, while the same have
been authorised to all other Central Govt employees? The issues of serving personnel which had
been reviewed by the committee of secretaries headed by the Cabinet Secy by the
PM without any representation from the
Defence Forces, have not been decided as yet.
You are aware that the grant of legitimate demands in respect of serving
personnel has direct bearing on the pensions of the veterans, since pensions
are 50 percent of the pay. Why these
genuine demands are ignored with impunity is causing lot of heart burns to the
defence personnel.
(g) Healthcare of veterans is one of the
important aspects of post retirement needs.
The ECHS though a step in the right direction needs to be upgraded in
quality and content. The scheme which
was meant to provide Super Specialty medical care closer home to the veterans
has been facing numerous problems
as under :-
(i) There is an acute shortage of funds. While the budget for CGHS last year was
planned at Rs 10500/- per beneficiary, the ECHS funds have been allotted at the
rates of Rs 3050/- per beneficiary. Why
this large gap, when the provision of medical care across the country in the
interiors would cost more than the urban areas where majority of CGHS
beneficiaries reside? Why this
inadequate allotment to ECHS is not understood?
There are over 42 lacs 50 thousand beneficiaries of ECHS and accordingly
even at the rate of Rs 10500, the amount works out to Rs 4500 crores. The ECHS budget allotment last year was
merely 1600 crores.
(ii) Consequently, the bills of the empaneled
hospitals are not paid for long time, forcing these hospitals to withdraw from
the scheme. This has caused serious
shortcomings and difficulties in provisioning of Medical Care to the
veterans. Over 80 percent of the good
Super Specialty Hospitals have withdrawn from the scheme. Probably, you may not be aware that city like
Mumbai does not have any ECHS
empaneled hospital. Is it a surprise to
you Mr. Defence Minister or you are aware of it and has done nothing about
it? The Secy DESW has done nothing to
ensure Super Specialty hospitals are empaneled across the country to assist the
MD ECHS to manage the scheme effectively.
We had forwarded a list of suggestions but due to lackadaisical attitude of the MoD, our suggestions have been
totally ignored.
(iii) Out sourcing of Pharmacy to provide the
required medicines has not been sanctioned inspite of assurances from you. Over sixty important medicines are not
available in ECHS across the country.
Why the Finance Ministry has not been able to accept your
recommendations are again not understood?
4. Mr.
Defence Minister, we expect you to kindly give due considerations to our
genuine demands and grant these at the earliest to undo the injustice. We again review our request for a meeting
with you of our delegations at the earliest please.
With Regards,
Jai Hind
Yours Sincerely,
Yours Sincerely,
Maj
Gen (Retd) Satbir Singh, SM
Vice
Chairman Indian Ex Servicemen Movement
Mobile: 9312404269, 0124-411057
Mobile: 9312404269, 0124-411057
Email:satbirsm@yahoo.com,
satbirsm@gmail.com
Copy
to:-
General
Bikram Singh, PVSM, UYSM, AVSM, SM, VSM, ADC
Chief of the Army Staff. | |
Admiral
Devendra Kumar Joshi, PVSM, AVSM, YSM, NM, VSM, ADC Chief of the Naval
Staff
| |
Air Chief
Marshal Norman Anil Kumar Browne, PVSM, AVSM, VM.
Chairman Chiefs of Staff | |
Sir, I intend to clarify, if all these letters of Maj Gen Satbir Singh, actually reach RM or just buried by his Secretariat staff who also happens to be bureaucrats, the majority of complaints being against their functioning and enemetic attitude towards the Defence Service Community.
ReplyDelete