The BJP in its
election manifesto assured the nation that on being voted to power it would
ensure implementation of the long standing demand of veterans on OROP.
Comments by an aggrieved Veteran
The OROP which they had offered in a much fan fared announcement on 5th Sep 2015, at the end of nearly 15 months in office, was by no means any where near the OROP defined and approved by the Parliament of India. The job which could very well have been accomplished within a month or two in this IT savvy era, has been done in a period of nearly fifteen months, and that too in a most slipshod and incompetent a manner, to cheat and betray the Veterans in every respect. It obviously appears to be an unholy nexus between the bureaucracy and the concerned ruling party ministers who have been made to look ignorant of their own assignments, and have become a party to subverting the true definition of OROP at the behest of some culprits, to the disadvantage of the very hopeful Veterans. It would be really worth while for Indian public to know as to the manner in which a ruling Indian Government, inclusive of its bureaucracy, operates, to bluff and let down its own Veterans who have sacrificed the best part of their life in the service of this Nation. This certainly is no way to repay the debt of country's brave soldiers, who have been compelled to take to the streets to have the promises made by past Governments in the last over four decades, fulfilled to the full satisfaction of the Veterans of all ranks.
OROP as per the Koshiyary Committee Report, as also announced in the full house of Parliament by a Minister of State for Defence, implies that uniform
pension be paid to the Armed Forces Personnel retiring in the same rank with
the same length of service irrespective of their date of retirement and any
future enhancement in the rates of pension to be automatically passed on to the
past pensioners.
On the 5th Sep 2015, The Hon'ble RM announced the acceptance by the
Govt of India of the demand of OROP. However, there are 7 REASONS WHY VETERANS
ARE UNHAPPY AT THE PRESENT FORMAT OF OROP as announced by the RM. These are: -
1. Base year for implementation of OROP agreed to as FY 2013-14,
Changed to Calendar year 2013. This will completely ruin definition of OROP by
creating a divide between pensioners past & present destroying the soul of
OROP. This is not acceptable.*
2. Date of Implementation agreed to was 01 Apr 2014, which has been pushed
forward to 01 Jul 2014. This will benefit the Govt by 2100 crores and cause loss to
ESM by same amount. Hardly worth depriving soldiers and widows of the same.
This is not acceptable.*
3. Rationalization of pensions being Insisted on as once in five
years instead of annually this will destroy the OROP definition completely
.This will be ONE RANK FIVE PENSIONS INSTEAD OF OROP. This is not acceptable.*
4. Substitution of a One man Judicial commission instead of the
five member suggested.
#(THESE WERE THE ONLY FOUR POINTS DISCUSSED BETWEEN GOVT REPRESENTATIVES & VETERANS TILL AS LATE AS 1130 h 05 SEP 2014, THE DAY OF THE ANNOUNCEMENT)
5. The most surprising exclusion of those who opt for VRS ie Pre Mature Retirement from
benefits accruing from OROP. There is nothing called VRS in Armed
Forces. This term is for civil servants
and for public sector units. These employees are asked to go home by paying
them large amounts to the tune of lacs of Rs as Golden Hand Shake. This
facility does not exist in Armed Forces, here all soldiers apply for Premature
Release after completing minimum qualifying length of service and earn their
pension. How can a soldier, who has earned his pension after completing Govt
laid down rules, be denied his deferred wages in the form of OROP. This is
against the law of the land. We are surprised as to how a Govt would wish to deprive its brave soldiers, of their basic rights of pension. If forced, we shall exercise
the legal option in the Hon’ble SC assisted by Mr. Ram Jethmalani.
6. The Fixation of pension be done as a mean/average of the pay
band instead of the top level. This is an unheard of provision and will kill the OROP definition in totality.
The implication of a junior drawing higher pension than his senior defeats the very basics of service ethos. This is not acceptable.*
7. The suggestion of Handing over working out of modalities to 7
CPC. Objected to because: -#
(a) Once adopted by Parliament (Two successive ones in this
case), No CPC or any other such commission has authority to adjudicate.
(b) Once granted OROP is in perpetuity.
(POINTS AT 5, 6 & 7 WERE NEVER DISCUSSED AT ANY LEVEL OR BY ANY
OF THE GOVT REPRESENTATIVES TILL ANNOUNCED ON 05 SEP 2014 AT 2.30 PM)
The Government claims to have approved an expenditure of Rs 10000 crores for OROP and with the restrictions now being suggested, it will be spending only about 3000 to 4000 crores. People of India will decide who is being greedy, Armed Forces
Personnel who are being cheated of Rs 6000 to 7000 crores or the Government
which is spreading misinformation.
While the Government struggles with rolling out of OROP, the issue of Non Functional Upgrade (NFU), which was granted to civil servants and all 58 class A services in 2006 has obviously been kept away from public scrutiny. The same was deliberately denied to the Armed Forces in an attempt to further degrade them. The scheme envisages the pay and perks of higher appointment without even working for that appointment. The outlay on this scheme by the Govt has been Rs 21000 crores PA. This figure is likely to go up to around 30000 crores with courts permitting NFU to para military forces. WOULD IT NOT BE LOOTING THE POOR MAN OF INDIA TO SERVE THE ELITE CLASS OF A SERVICES.
While the Government struggles with rolling out of OROP, the issue of Non Functional Upgrade (NFU), which was granted to civil servants and all 58 class A services in 2006 has obviously been kept away from public scrutiny. The same was deliberately denied to the Armed Forces in an attempt to further degrade them. The scheme envisages the pay and perks of higher appointment without even working for that appointment. The outlay on this scheme by the Govt has been Rs 21000 crores PA. This figure is likely to go up to around 30000 crores with courts permitting NFU to para military forces. WOULD IT NOT BE LOOTING THE POOR MAN OF INDIA TO SERVE THE ELITE CLASS OF A SERVICES.
Therefore if implemented in its present form, the announced OROP
will not only violate the definition but cause heavy financial hardship to all
ranks across the board. In fact, this will not be OROP in its true sense. It
will also impediment the young profile of the Armed Forces that is necessarily
an Operational requirement. The veterans are not asking for anything more than
the originally approved OROP without any DILUTION.
Finally, in 2014, Veterans voted for parties/candidates who promised to approve OROP on coming to power. It is recommended that veterans reserve their right to vote for only those candidates who fulfil their promises. It is for information of all that veterans will not vote for those who have not fulfilled their promise and have remained only dream merchants.
Finally, in 2014, Veterans voted for parties/candidates who promised to approve OROP on coming to power. It is recommended that veterans reserve their right to vote for only those candidates who fulfil their promises. It is for information of all that veterans will not vote for those who have not fulfilled their promise and have remained only dream merchants.
MEDIA TEAM
UFESM
The Simple
Truth about One Rank One Pension (OROP)
Do 125 crore Indians know
1.
That OROP really “implies that uniform pension be paid to
the Armed Forces Personnel retiring in the same rank with the same length of
service irrespective of their date of retirement and any future enhancement in the rates of pension to be automatically passed on to the past
pensioners”
2.
Who recommended it? OROP
is a concept and acronym created by Congress appointed K P Singh Deo Committee
in 1983 post protest against reduction of pension of Defence personnel and
increase in pay and pension of civil personnel as a gift for winning the 1971
war.
3.
Why OROP to Armed Forces only? Because they retire in the age bracket
35-37 years. Would you like an army of 60 yrs old on your border? The Govt does
not absorb them laterally despite Pay Commission recommendations. OROP was very
much there till 1973 as Armed Forces personnel received 70% pension. For no
justifiable reason it was drastically reduced to 50%.
4.
All countries across the world pay higher pay and pension to their Armed
Forces.
5.
The Armed Forces retired personnel are struggling for the past 42 years
for OROP with no outcome except hollow promises by the Governments in power.
6.
Congress and BJP led
Govts aided by a phalanx of bureaucrats
deliberately fail to understand the reasons, the concept, the aim, and
the implications – financial, administrative, and legal – of OROP?
7.
That if approving OROP was a desperate UPA’s electoral death throes, and
then what was the BJP’s repeated “committed to OROP” about?
8.
The basic pension of a retired sepoy is - Rs. 6,120/- p.m. and that of a
widow of a soldier Rs. 3,672/- p.m. Even
with DA added, this is Rs 260 per
day which is about the same as the daily wage for unskilled, unemployed labourers in
some States.
9. OROP costs Rs 8,293/- crore which the PM feels that he has to give at
the cost of the poor. May we know at whose cost has the Govt given away Rs 1,23,000/- crore to Bihar, Rs 63,000
crore as tax exemptions to rich corporate in 2014-15, Rs 20, 000 crore to
offset losses of Public Sector Banks (PSB) by their bad loans and Rs 40, 000
crore of the poor to Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPI) in 2015-16?
10. Defence Forces Pensioners, 30 lakh in number, are
Income Tax Payers. All those in IT bracket honestly pay
income tax, and many trolls think defence pension is income-tax exempt. ESM contributed part of the largess of
the government as shown above.
11. OROP
Commitments and Implementation Issue was never serious matter for the Government.
In fact there was only a token allocation in budget. The
Budgets for 2014-2015 & 2015-16
make it clear that Ex-Servicemen (ESM) were led up the commitment path till 5th September
2015 by repeated announcements. The
Demand No. 22 of the budget clearly misses out OROP as part of Pensions and
other benefits. So, the FM (also RM from 27th May 2014
to 8th Nov 2014) did not even plan for the OROP in Budget 2015-16 and
hence the misery of depriving the poor to pay the tax paying ESM & widows
pronouncement by PM is a hoax.
12. If the RM states “Only 2.2
per cent additionally is needed for implementing OROP. I can recuperate that
amount by saving wastage,” why then is FM the self-appointed house wife crying
wolf over finances?
13. The serving and veterans are linked by a chord
and if the serving see the treatment to the veteran there is bound to be a
dissatisfied serving soldier and that is a National security risk.
Do
the 125 crore Indians still think that OROP is not deserved by Defence
veterans, that we are greedy and are coming up with new demands every day?
ESM hope that the PM will tell the truth about OROP
in his future speech(es) and uphold the national motto - Satyam mev Jayate.
The Govt has STILL NOT GIVEN OROP
as per the definition. What is announced by the defence Minister on 05 Sep 15
is nowhere near OROP.
No comments:
Post a Comment